From: owner-rawlife-digest@rawtimes.com (rawlife-digest) To: rawlife-digest@rawtimes.com Subject: rawlife-digest V1 #333 Reply-To: rawlife@rawtimes.com Sender: owner-rawlife-digest@rawtimes.com Errors-To: owner-rawlife-digest@rawtimes.com Precedence: bulk rawlife-digest Thursday, August 24 2000 Volume 01 : Number 333 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 04:40:17 -1000 From: Forest Subject: [Fwd: [HEALTHE] Biodiversity, not monoculture or pesticides,increases rice crop yields] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - --------------A47B5C64873CE53B248C199D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit another cheerful note on agriculture. - --------------A47B5C64873CE53B248C199D Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Received: from maelstrom.stjohns.edu [149.68.45.24] by kamaaina.wics.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.06) id AEB51B2013C; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 18:53:57 PST Received: from maelstrom.stjohns.edu (149.68.45.24) by maelstrom.stjohns.edu (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <0.61C83172@maelstrom.stjohns.edu>; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 0:56:06 -0400 Received: from MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU by MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 822581 for HEALTHE@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 00:56:01 -0400 Received: from mtiwmhc26.worldnet.att.net (204.127.131.51) by maelstrom.stjohns.edu (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <1.B1851EA6@maelstrom.stjohns.edu>; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 0:51:10 -0400 Received: from worldnet.att.net ([12.73.251.134]) by mtiwmhc26.worldnet.att.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.39 201-229-119-122) with ESMTP id <20000823045102.DQXW9297.mtiwmhc26.worldnet.att.net@worldnet.att.net>; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 04:51:02 +0000 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <39A35868.B3DF0E2F@worldnet.att.net> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 23:51:52 -0500 Reply-To: Health and Environment Resource Center Sender: Health and Environment Resource Center From: Bunny Snow Organization: Pollution Solution Subject: [HEALTHE] Biodiversity, not monoculture or pesticides, increases rice crop yields Comments: To: "informedchoices@egroups.com" , "la-envirotel@igc.topica.com" , mcs-ci-exile , Shelia Gradney To: HEALTHE@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU Get ready for more spin from the pesticide/biotech industry on this one. Biodiversity is the key to vastly increasing rice crop yields without monocultures, without biotechnology and, without toxic pesticides. ~Bunny Snow ___________________________________________________________________ NATIONAL Science/Health NEW YORK TIMES ON THE WEB August 22, 2000 Simple Method Found to Vastly Increase Crop Yields By CAROL KAESUK YOON In a stunning new result from what has become one of the largest agricultural experiments ever, thousands of rice farmers in China have doubled the yields of their most valuable crop and nearly eliminated its most devastating disease -- without using chemical treatments or spending a single extra penny. Under the direction of an international team of scientists, farmers in China's Yunnan Province implemented a simple change in their rice paddies. Instead of planting the large stands of a single type of rice, as they typically have done, the farmers planted a mixture of two different rices. With this one change, growers were able to radically restrict the incidence of rice blast -- the most important disease of this most important staple in the world. Within just two years, farmers were able to abandon the chemical fungicides previously widely used to fight the disease. - -- For entire article, see: http://www.nytimes.com/library/national/science/082200sci-gm-rice.html HealthE: Health and Environment Roundtable is provided as a public service by Health & Environment Resource Center. Archives and mail administration functions are available at http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/healthe.html For automated list help send an e-mail with the message 'help' to healthe-request@maelstrom.stjohns.edu Information on Health & Environment Resource Center can be found at http://www.herc.org - --------------A47B5C64873CE53B248C199D-- - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:36:24 -1000 From: Forest Subject: Re: eye color changes hey carol, don't take it too hard, it's healthy to get a chuckle assuming it is not overpoking fun at someone else. i think it is quite possible for the entire body to undergo changes due to dietary changes including the eyes. iridology is a science dedicated to that concept and is very fascinating from my limited perspective. f - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:52:05 EDT From: HFWESSELS@aol.com Subject: Re: distilled water/Victor Schauberger In a message dated 08/22/2000 11:06:08 AM Eastern Daylight Time, rwavery@juno.com writes: Bob- are you familiar with Victor Schauberger's book "Living Water". He was a brilliant scientist who promoted creating braids in rivers and streams to change the vitality of water. He said all water coming out of pipes is dead and that it needs to be revitalized by re-establishing the spiral motion of the water.... Heide > All water on the planet has been evaporated at one time or another. If > it were once "alive," it is now all "dead," or does it resurrect itself > when it condenses? > > How do you define "life"? The capability of self-replication is > considered to be a primary distiction between life and non-life. Water > does not reproduce itself. By any normal definition of the word, water > is not alive. - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 21:18:48 GMT From: "judy mcdonough" Subject: monogamy This is a question to all the men on the list, Up until yesterday, I was in a year long relationship which I thought was wonderful and monogamous. I found out yesterday that it was not as monogamous as I thought (he was a s.a.d. eater who could not even begin to comprehend the concept of raw food). Now, my broken hearted self wants to know if raw foodism changes a man in that respect. It seems like in the animal kingdom, all the animals are either monogamous or polygamous by instinct, and there is no jealousy involved. Humans seem to be confused about the issue and it leads to lies and anger. So, I want to ask the men who are raw -- does eating raw food change anything? judy _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:03:53 EDT From: Coya4321@aol.com Subject: Re: Here is an article that was in the bradenton paper--excellant exposure nuts should only be consumed in small quantities because they are very acidic to the body and they should be consumed with leafy greens--i dont think they know about soaking--i eat nuts all the time--they probably say little oil because it is so concentrated--i eat it but feel it is unnatural because you would not find this in nature--that is often how i think of things before i eat them=---i ask myself if i can find this food in this form in nature--if not then it probably was not made for eating. Grains are also very acidifying and addicting--read Grain Damage by Dr. Graham--you can get it on rawfoods.com for about $6 and it is quick read--also read the book behind that article-it is excellent--Gods way to ultimate health--it does not preach religion at all. God bless, Ruth - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:06:36 EDT From: Coya4321@aol.com Subject: Re:nuts soaked nuts are much easier to digest--i can tell the difference when i dont soak them-----Ruth - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:41:05 -0700 From: "Davey" Subject: Re: monogamy Hi Judy, I've been raw for a year and I have not noticed that it changes my interest in other sexual partners. I think that humans are perhap polygamous by nature but that monogamy is a discipline which does have its virtues. The problem, of course, is when the needs/desires of the two partners are not the same (one wants/is monogamous, while the other wants/is polygamous). This is compounded when the issue is not out in the open, discussed and agreed upon beforehand. It may be perfectly okay for partners to reach and "understanding" around this issue even when needs are different. It is hurtful, though, if one partner is kept in the dark about what is actually going on in desires and actions. If this issue is the only problem with the recent relationship, you may want to examine your assumption that relationships "should be" monogamous. You may be assuming that your partner is playing by your rules around this issue. Again, it is alway best to discuss before making assumptions. Of course, if you did have an agreement, and were deceived, then this represents a serious break in trust. At any rate, I hope that I am not sencing that you are attempting to "fix his problem" if only he would follow my example and eat all raw. If this is your thinking, I would take a closer look at it - sounds fairly controlling. But perhaps you are only thinking that if you perfer monogamy, you may have a better chance of finding a like-minded mate if you find a raw-partner. This is more legit thinking, but again, I don't think that it follows that your sexual proclivities change that much from eating all raw. Would be interesting to hear what others experience is on this. David. Vancouver, BC - -----Original Message----- From: judy mcdonough To: rawlife@rawtimes.com Date: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 2:23 PM Subject: monogamy >This is a question to all the men on the list, >Up until yesterday, I was in a year long relationship which I thought was >wonderful and monogamous. I found out yesterday that it was not as >monogamous as I thought (he was a s.a.d. eater who could not even begin to >comprehend the concept of raw food). Now, my broken hearted self wants to >know if raw foodism changes a man in that respect. It seems like in the >animal kingdom, all the animals are either monogamous or polygamous by >instinct, and there is no jealousy involved. Humans seem to be confused >about the issue and it leads to lies and anger. >So, I want to ask the men who are raw -- does eating raw food change >anything? >judy >_________________________________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > > >--- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html >subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:11:28 -0400 From: Bob Avery Subject: Re: distilled water/Victor Schauberger This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - ----__JNP_000_32bc.3bb7.2c47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Heide, >are you familiar with Victor Schauberger's book "Living Water". He was a >brilliant scientist who promoted creating braids in rivers and streams to >change the vitality of water. He said all water coming out of pipes is dead >and that it needs to be revitalized by re-establishing the spiral motion of >the water.... No, but this is only "living" in a metaphorical sense. Inanimate objects are not "alive" in the same way biological entities are. Perhaps a better term would be "energized." Bob Avery (RWAvery@vegetarians.com) - ----__JNP_000_32bc.3bb7.2c47 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Heide,
 
>are you familiar with Victor Schauberger's book "Living Water". He= was=20 a
>brilliant scientist who promoted creating braids in rivers and = streams=20 to
>change the vitality of water. He said all water coming out of = pipes=20 is dead
>and that it needs to be revitalized by re-establishing the= =20 spiral motion of
>the water....
 
No, but this is only "living" in a metaphorical sense.  Inanimate= =20 objects are not "alive" in the same way biological entities are.  = Perhaps a=20 better term would be "energized."
 
Bob Avery (RWAvery@vegetarians.com)
- ----__JNP_000_32bc.3bb7.2c47-- ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:45:00 -0400 From: Bob Avery Subject: Re: monogamy This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - ----__JNP_000_5cde.1ff9.6dbb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Judy, >Now, my broken hearted self wants to >know if raw foodism changes a man in that respect. It seems like in the >animal kingdom, all the animals are either monogamous or polygamous by >instinct, and there is no jealousy involved. Humans seem to be confused >about the issue and it leads to lies and anger. Well, it doesn't seem to have changed my philosophical beliefs about monogamy vs polygamy, but it has diminshed the urge to reproduce sufficiently that I feel more that I control IT rather than ITS controlling me, if you know what I mean. So whatever behavioral actions along those lines I pursue are more likely to be deliberate, thought-out ones, and not simply reactions to spur-of-the-moment impulses. Bob Avery (RWAvery@vegetarians.com) - ----__JNP_000_5cde.1ff9.6dbb Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Judy,
 
>Now, my broken hearted self  wants to
>know if raw = foodism=20 changes a man in that respect. It seems like in the
>animal kingdom,= all=20 the animals are either monogamous or polygamous by
>instinct, and = there=20 is no jealousy involved. Humans seem to be confused
>about the issue= and=20 it leads to lies and anger.
 
Well, it doesn't seem to have changed my philosophical beliefs about=20 monogamy vs polygamy, but it has diminshed the urge to reproduce = sufficiently=20 that I feel more that I control IT rather than ITS controlling me, if you = know=20 what I mean. 
 
So whatever behavioral actions along those lines I pursue are more = likely=20 to be deliberate, thought-out ones, and not simply reactions to=20 spur-of-the-moment impulses.
 
Bob Avery (RWAvery@vegetarians.com)
- ----__JNP_000_5cde.1ff9.6dbb-- ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 03:37:44 GMT From: "judy mcdonough" Subject: Re: monogamy Bob, > >Well, it doesn't seem to have changed my philosophical beliefs about >monogamy vs polygamy, but it has diminshed the urge to reproduce >sufficiently that I feel more that I control IT rather than ITS >controlling me, if you know what I mean. > >So whatever behavioral actions along those lines I pursue are more likely >to be deliberate, thought-out ones, and not simply reactions to >spur-of-the-moment impulses. > Thank you, that is so good to hear...and as usual, very well said. With raw food, it seems like everything flows in a logical, natural direction and what you said confirms that this is no exception. Davey, > >course, if you did have an agreement, and were deceived, then this >represents a serious break in trust. > >At any rate, I hope that I am not sencing that you are attempting to "fix >his problem" if only he would follow my example and eat all raw. If this >is >your thinking, I would take a closer look at it - sounds fairly >controlling. Oh yes, it was definitely a break in trust. No, I am not attempting to fix his problem. He is too stupid to ever be a raw foodist. Yes, that is partly anger talking, but mostly truth. At this point, my thoughts are more towards slashing his tires than fixing any problem he might have. I'm sorry, thats my emotions talking. judy ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 23:54:29 -0400 From: attuner Subject: Re: monogamy when all raw, monogamy was the way. when partial raw, or eating cooked, monogamy was the way. whether it is religious upbringing, a rightness to the situation, a spiritual principle, "trust" as has been just mentioned, these are all individual issues that may be more in line with maturity and self image than what you eat. raw food eating may bring clarity on some levels, but you could still possibly need the attention of more than one partner if feeling inadequate in other areas, or perhaps immature and not self sufficient. the background behind the need is probably more psycho spiritual and not one of choice of food. there are a lot of horny spiritual materialists out there, and eating raw is just another spiritual materialistic form for some. it doesn't necessarily convey piety or self control. that is a matter of character. who YOU really are. the real essential You, not the egoic you. my choice is that monogamy is honoring myself and my partner. more than one lover at a time is dishonoring and simply just doesn't feel right. too much posturing and being phony. when i caught my first ex in her big lie that she was not at work ( she was at her adulterous rendezvous), she was pissed that i found out, totally denied it, stormed out of the room, slammed the door and locked herself in the bedroom, and would not talk about it. the lying hurt more than the action. however, earlier in the day when i saw her car in the driveway of this guys house instead of at work, i had murderous rage to contend with. hopefully you can enjoy your anger for what it is and have a good laugh instead. envelop the situation with the TOTALITY OF YOUR BEING. ENCOMPASS THE EMOTION WITH THE LOVE YOU HAVE FOR LIFE AND YOURSELF. YOU ARE LARGER, MUCH LARGER THAN THE SITUATION. and please don't do anything to hurt yourself. be kind and gentle and give yourself the same loving attention you would to a friend. love, neil At 09:18 PM 08/23/2000 +0000, you wrote: >This is a question to all the men on the list, >Up until yesterday, I was in a year long relationship which I thought was >wonderful and monogamous. I found out yesterday that it was not as >monogamous as I thought (he was a s.a.d. eater who could not even begin to >comprehend the concept of raw food). Now, my broken hearted self wants to >know if raw foodism changes a man in that respect. It seems like in the >animal kingdom, all the animals are either monogamous or polygamous by >instinct, and there is no jealousy involved. Humans seem to be confused >about the issue and it leads to lies and anger. >So, I want to ask the men who are raw -- does eating raw food change anything? >judy >_________________________________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > > >--- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html >subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 08:25:14 GMT From: "judy mcdonough" Subject: Re: monogamy Neil, >self image than what you eat. raw food eating may bring clarity on some >levels, but you could still possibly need the attention of more than one >partner if feeling inadequate in other areas, or perhaps immature and not >self sufficient. the background behind the need is probably more psycho > >totally denied it, stormed out of the room, slammed the door and locked >herself in the bedroom, and would not talk about it. the lying hurt more >than the action. however, earlier in the day when i saw her car in the >driveway of this guys house instead of at work, i had murderous rage to >contend with. hopefully you can enjoy your anger for what it is and have a >good laugh instead. envelop the situation with the TOTALITY OF YOUR BEING. >ENCOMPASS THE EMOTION WITH THE LOVE YOU HAVE FOR LIFE AND YOURSELF. YOU ARE >LARGER, MUCH LARGER THAN THE SITUATION. and please don't do anything to >hurt yourself. be kind and gentle and give yourself the same loving >attention you would to a friend. love, neil > > Yes, you hit the nail on the head. He does have a huge ego, but at the same time he feels inadequate and seriously craves attention (his problems stem from a really bad childhood). He is also in total denial, even though I have clear proof. What clinched it was when I coincidentally ran into a mutual acquaintance who confirmed everything I suspected. I am also feeling the murderous rage, however would not actually hurt him because he's not worth it, and would definitely not hurt myself either, because I do know that I am bigger than the situation, and time will heal it. Everyone deals with this kind of thing different - some people get drunk or hurt people...but me, it makes me want to fast for most of the day, and has actually strengthened my resolve to cleanse and stay on raw food. judy ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 05:36:57 EDT From: NoGuile144@aol.com Subject: Re: monogamy Hi Judy, Looks like each of us men here review our own lives to find an adequate response to your question. For me the issue of monogamy is a spiritual issue and heightened by the raw lifestyle. While the animal kingdom lives by instincts, then for us we have been given a choice what to live by. When the spiritual if fully understood and experienced then the joy of our life does not have to depend fully on the actions of our partner or for that matter on the doings of others. We can fully love them and just feel sorry for others who just are following their instincts and have no feelings or understanding about their obligations to others and all living, including themselves. Judy you have stated well: <> It sounds good and now in His joy, Peter In a message dated 8/24/00 4:26:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time, judymcdonough@hotmail.com writes: << Neil, >self image than what you eat. raw food eating may bring clarity on some >levels, but you could still possibly need the attention of more than one >partner if feeling inadequate in other areas, or perhaps immature and not >self sufficient. the background behind the need is probably more psycho > >totally denied it, stormed out of the room, slammed the door and locked >herself in the bedroom, and would not talk about it. the lying hurt more >than the action. however, earlier in the day when i saw her car in the >driveway of this guys house instead of at work, i had murderous rage to >contend with. hopefully you can enjoy your anger for what it is and have a >good laugh instead. envelop the situation with the TOTALITY OF YOUR BEING. >ENCOMPASS THE EMOTION WITH THE LOVE YOU HAVE FOR LIFE AND YOURSELF. YOU ARE >LARGER, MUCH LARGER THAN THE SITUATION. and please don't do anything to >hurt yourself. be kind and gentle and give yourself the same loving >attention you would to a friend. love, neil > > Yes, you hit the nail on the head. He does have a huge ego, but at the same time he feels inadequate and seriously craves attention (his problems stem from a really bad childhood). He is also in total denial, even though I have clear proof. What clinched it was when I coincidentally ran into a mutual acquaintance who confirmed everything I suspected. I am also feeling the murderous rage, however would not actually hurt him because he's not worth it, and would definitely not hurt myself either, because I do know that I am bigger than the situation, and time will heal it. Everyone deals with this kind of thing different - some people get drunk or hurt people...but me, it makes me want to fast for most of the day, and has actually strengthened my resolve to cleanse and stay on raw food. judy _________________________________ >> - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 05:57:25 EDT From: NoGuile144@aol.com Subject: Re: Here is an article that was in the bradenton paper--excellant exposure Hi Judy, On the consumption of nuts - to my understanding almonds supposedly are the only alkaline nuts, besides so much better if soaked. Consumption should be small, because of the high fat and protein. Grains - I thought that most of them are acidic except millet. Once the grains are sprouted they supposedly are now safe for our consumption, but still sparingly. In His love, Peter In a message dated 8/23/00 6:05:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Coya4321@aol.com writes: << nuts should only be consumed in small quantities because they are very acidic to the body and they should be consumed with leafy greens--i dont think they know about soaking--i eat nuts all the time--they probably say little oil because it is so concentrated--i eat it but feel it is unnatural because you would not find this in nature--that is often how i think of things before i eat them=---i ask myself if i can find this food in this form in nature--if not then it probably was not made for eating. Grains are also very acidifying and addicting--read Grain Damage by Dr. Graham--you can get it on rawfoods.com for about $6 and it is quick read--also read the book behind that article-it is excellent--Gods way to ultimate health--it does not preach religion at all. God bless, Ruth >> - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 21:32:41 +1000 From: Vicky Subject: Re: monogamy It didnt for me, except make me have low motivation towards most things, including sex.... Smiles, Franny > > So, I want to ask the men who are raw -- does eating raw food change > anything? > judy > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html > subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 07:22:02 -0400 From: "Gary Orlando" Subject: Re: Here is an article that was in the bradenton paper--excellant exposure Gary Orlando@SDP 08/24/2000 07:22 AM Shelton stated that pistachios and coconuts are the only alkaline nuts, from what I recall. I ate almost a pound of pistachios yesterday. I hardly ever eat nuts - they make my eyes red, and so did these (next day). They had some addictive quality to them - OR there was some nutritional need being fulfilled. They were unsalted, unroasted, in-shell from sunorganic, so I don't know why I ate so many, except that they tasted good. Gary NoGuile144@aol.com on 08/24/2000 05:57:25 AM Please respond to rawlife@rawtimes.com To: rawlife@rawtimes.com cc: (bcc: Gary Orlando/SDP) Subject: Re: Here is an article that was in the bradenton paper--excellant exposure Hi Judy, On the consumption of nuts - to my understanding almonds supposedly are the only alkaline nuts, besides so much better if soaked. Consumption should be small, because of the high fat and protein. Grains - I thought that most of them are acidic except millet. Once the grains are sprouted they supposedly are now safe for our consumption, but still sparingly. In His love, Peter In a message dated 8/23/00 6:05:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Coya4321@aol.com writes: << nuts should only be consumed in small quantities because they are very acidic to the body and they should be consumed with leafy greens--i dont think they know about soaking--i eat nuts all the time--they probably say little oil because it is so concentrated--i eat it but feel it is unnatural because you would not find this in nature--that is often how i think of things before i eat them=---i ask myself if i can find this food in this form in nature--if not then it probably was not made for eating. Grains are also very acidifying and addicting--read Grain Damage by Dr. Graham--you can get it on rawfoods.com for about $6 and it is quick read--also read the book behind that article-it is excellent--Gods way to ultimate health--it does not preach religion at all. God bless, Ruth >> - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:22:15 -0400 From: attuner Subject: Re: monogamy right ON peter! At 05:36 AM 08/24/2000 -0400, you wrote: >Hi Judy, >Looks like each of us men here review our own lives to find an adequate >response to your question. For me the issue of monogamy is a spiritual issue >and heightened by the raw lifestyle. While the animal kingdom lives by >instincts, then for us we have been given a choice what to live by. When the >spiritual if fully understood and experienced then the joy of our life does >not have to depend fully on the actions of our partner or for that matter on >the doings of others. We can fully love them and just feel sorry for others >who just are following their instincts and have no feelings or understanding >about their obligations to others and all living, including themselves. >Judy you have stated well: >< hurt people...but me, it makes me want to fast for most of the day, and has > actually strengthened my resolve to cleanse and stay on raw food.>> >It sounds good and now in His joy, Peter > > > >In a message dated 8/24/00 4:26:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time, >judymcdonough@hotmail.com writes: > ><< Neil, > > >self image than what you eat. raw food eating may bring clarity on some > >levels, but you could still possibly need the attention of more than one > >partner if feeling inadequate in other areas, or perhaps immature and not > >self sufficient. the background behind the need is probably more psycho > > > > >totally denied it, stormed out of the room, slammed the door and locked > >herself in the bedroom, and would not talk about it. the lying hurt more > >than the action. however, earlier in the day when i saw her car in the > >driveway of this guys house instead of at work, i had murderous rage to > >contend with. hopefully you can enjoy your anger for what it is and have a > >good laugh instead. envelop the situation with the TOTALITY OF YOUR BEING. > >ENCOMPASS THE EMOTION WITH THE LOVE YOU HAVE FOR LIFE AND YOURSELF. YOU ARE > >LARGER, MUCH LARGER THAN THE SITUATION. and please don't do anything to > >hurt yourself. be kind and gentle and give yourself the same loving > >attention you would to a friend. love, neil > > > > > Yes, you hit the nail on the head. He does have a huge ego, but at the same > time he feels inadequate and seriously craves attention (his problems stem > from a really bad childhood). He is also in total denial, even though I > have > clear proof. What clinched it was when I coincidentally ran into a mutual > acquaintance who confirmed everything I suspected. > I am also feeling the murderous rage, however would not actually hurt him > because he's not worth it, and would definitely not hurt myself either, > because I do know that I am bigger than the situation, and time will heal > it. > Everyone deals with this kind of thing different - some people get drunk or > hurt people...but me, it makes me want to fast for most of the day, and has > actually strengthened my resolve to cleanse and stay on raw food. > > judy > _________________________________ >> > >--- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html >subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:24:31 -0400 From: attuner Subject: Re: monogamy yeah, low libido was also happening, but i think that if i met the right raw lady, then sparks would most likely fly for that is nature's way. neil At 09:32 PM 08/24/2000 +1000, you wrote: >It didnt for me, except make me have low motivation towards most things, >including sex.... > >Smiles, > Franny > > > > > So, I want to ask the men who are raw -- does eating raw food change > > anything? > > judy > > _________________________________________________________________________ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > > http://profiles.msn.com. > > > > --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html > > subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net > > >--- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html >subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 7:58:21 -0600 From: "Carol Giambri" Subject: Hall. Diet and books Guess who also has books from Hall. Acres? I have about 24+ of these books (Recipes for Life from God's Garden)I market for the same price + shipping if you are interested. As part of their ministry, but must admit very slow moving, I purchased all these books and still have bunches to go. Hope this is "kosher" to let you know this as I would love to lighten the load...$24.95 + 5.00 s/h....thanks. Email me privately. Carol G. - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:25:28 +0000 (GMT) From: jbmc@attglobal.net Subject: Re: monogamy At 09:18 PM 8/23/00 GMT, Ms. McDonough wrote: >So, I want to ask the men who are raw -- does eating raw food change anything? * * * * * * * It does change to the extend that the raw regimen practiced allows the Organism to detox Itself. It may well be necessary, here, to call Your attention to the fact that not all raw regimens are equal, nor all lend themselves to the same conclusion: those, in fact, which incorporate concentrated substances - be it starch or fat - allow the Organism to a certain degree of detox, while "that" which totally excludes these substances allows the Organism to a complete detox. Libido is strictly connected and dependent to the state of toxicity of the Organism: a perfectly detoxified One rises above sex and emerges into the dimension of Love. Sincerely, jb Mirabile-caruso. ================================================================== "Foliar Vegetarianism": the only pathway back to Edenic physiology ================================================================== - --- RAWLIFE- faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net ------------------------------ End of rawlife-digest V1 #333 ***************************** --- RAWLIFE-DIGEST - faq at http://www.rawtimes.com/rawlife.html subscriptions, problems, questions, mailto:attuner@bestweb.net